SpanglefishP-M: F | sitemap | log in
This is a free Spanglefish 1 website.

NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING AND INTENT

 

I, Paul-Maurice: Fiola, a flesh and blood living being in a Common Law jurisdiction, allegedly born, as I have been led to believe, in the city called Winnipeg in the geographic region called Manitoba on or about the 8th day in the month of September in the year 1973, to Gertrude Lambert and Maurice Fiola, hereby state my Understanding and my law:

 

  1. Whereas it is my understanding that a Notice of Understanding and Intent and a Claim of Right, hereinafter NOUI/COR are ancient concepts that have a firm and binding foundation in law, and,
     
  2. Whereas it is my understanding that the NOUI/COR are initially offers for discussion of the subject matter, and,
     
  3. Whereas it is my understanding that a refusal or failure to properly dispute the specifics of the NOUI/COR has the effect of rendering them binding on the parties involved, their agents, successors and assignees from that moment forward, and, 
     
  4. Whereas it is my understanding that this discussion or dispute must, by law, be commenced within the reasonable time and fashion stated or the NOUI/COR is considered contract, and thus binding from that time forward through acceptance by acquiescence, and,
     
  5. Whereas it is my understanding that a blanket statement denying the NOUI/COR is insufficient to dispute the points presented in these documents, and, 
     
  6. Whereas it is my understanding that a judge in a court, bound on record to his oath of office cannot interpret law but must act only on the facts presented, and,
     
  7. Whereas it is my understanding that any court action or adjudication of a matter where the Crown is either plaintiff or defendant creates a conflict of interest within the court, as they are representatives of and employed by the Crown, and therefore a fair trial is impossible, and, 
     
  8. Whereas it is my understanding that a summons, or notice to appear are only offers and are not compelling to action, and, 
     
  9. Whereas it is my understanding that an offer for discussion and negotiation must be presented first before any court or adjudication action can take place, and that court action can only take place if the offer for discussion or negotiation is refused, or cannot create an agreement, and, 
     
  10. Whereas it is my understanding that a “person”, either natural or artificial is, in law, a body of rights and duties, and akin to a role or mask as suggested by the Greek “persona” and flesh and blood human beings are not obligated to accept the role of “person”, and ,
     
  11. Whereas it is my understanding that I, the conscious, free will being of energy inhabiting a physical body, the author of this document, am not a “person” but have the ability to accept or reject that body of rights and duties as I see fit, and,
     
  12. Whereas it is my understanding that the only body of rights and duties I freely accept are those that are encompassed by natural law, often expressed as common law, and,
     
  13. Whereas it is my understanding that Canada is a nation founded upon the belief in the principals of the supremacy of God and the rule of law, and this defined a hierarchy with God at the top and the number two position claimed by no-one, and,
     
  14. Whereas it is my understanding that it is within my capacity as a free will, living being to claim the number two position in the above hierarchy as rightfully mine and therefore will exist above, and have preferred claim over any and all corporate or commercial entities, and, 
     
  15. Whereas it is my understanding that the Government of Canada and the Provincial Government of Manitoba are acting agents for the Corporation CANADA and the Corporation THE PROVINCE OF MANITOBA or MANITOBA, and is the same with all the other provinces and territories of the geographical land mass called Canada, and,
     
  16. Whereas it is my understanding that the Bank of Canada is not a Government department but operates as a private corporation, and,
     
  17. Whereas it is my understanding that the Corporation CANADA is insolvent, and,
     
  18. Whereas it is my understanding that the above mentioned Governments needed to gain legal title to property in order to pledge these assets to the Bank of Canada as any debtor must pledge collateral and security to its creditor, and through certain legislative processes as well as the registration of land, have deceitfully gained unlawful title to these assets, and,
     
  19. Whereas it is my understanding that my Mother and/or Father signed a statement of live birth when I was born and it was from this information that the Government was made aware that a new human resource had been made available to the Government, and,
     
  20. Whereas it is my understanding that as an entity born in the geographical landmass known as Canada, I have right by birth to a portion of the lands and resources of that landmass, and,
     
  21. Whereas it is my understanding that in the past an all capitalized name indicated a legal and/or commercial entity and can never be directly associated with a living soul without the consent of that same living soul, and,
     
  22. Whereas it is my understanding that the name of a legal entity, or “person” may have various formats, but all formats used within legal documents unless specifically stated otherwise refer to that legal entity or “person”, and,
     
  23. Whereas it is my understanding that the Government issued a birth certificate to register the event of a birth using the information presented by my Mother and Father, and with it, created a commercial account for a legal entity or “person” named FIOLA, PAUL MAURICE, and,
     
  24. Whereas it is my understanding that many birth certificates have printed on the back “Revenue Receipt, Treasury use only”, and,
     
  25. Whereas it is my understanding that being in possession of a revenue receipt means that there is or was a transaction of a security interest, bearing revenue, and,
     
  26. Whereas it is my understanding that the birth certificate bearing the name of the legal entity FIOLA, PAUL MAURICE is associated with the consolidated revenue fund, and,
     
  27. Whereas it is my understanding that the consolidated revenue fund is in actuality a fund containing a portion of the value of the lands and public assets of the geographical landmass called Canada, and,
     
  28. Whereas it is my understanding that corporations extracting these resources in fact owe a debt to the people of the landmass known as Canada as compensation for the removal of their resources, and,
     
  29. Whereas it is my understanding that I, the author of this notice, constitute the conscious, free will being that provides the energy that allows the soulless commercial entity FIOLA, PAUL MAURICE to function in commerce, as without my energy the legal fiction cannot operate, and,
     
  30. Whereas it is my understanding that the legislated Acts of CANADA are populated by Statutes, and,
     
  31. Whereas it is my understanding that a Statute is defined as a rule of a Society that has been given the force of law, and not, by definition, a law, and,
     
  32. Whereas it is my understanding that the definition of a Society is a group of individuals gathered together by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and,
     
  33. Whereas it is my understanding that there is no obligation to consent to association with any Society, and,
     
  34. Whereas it is my understanding that it is lawful to revoke consent to association with any Society, and,
     
  35. Whereas it is my understanding that by revoking consent to association with any Society that the Statutes of that Society no longer apply to the one revoking consent, and,
     
  36. Whereas it is my understanding that there is no obligation for any individual to have or produce identification, and all current identification provided by government agencies evidences a corporate entity and not a physical one, and,
     
  37. Whereas it is my understanding that a certificate of birth is not identification of the flesh and blood being, as that information is hearsay and the individual cannot attest to its validity, and all other documents claimed to be identification based upon the information on that certificate of birth are invalid due to this hearsay, as applicable to a flesh and blood being, and,
     
  38. Whereas it is my understanding that these documents considered identification are in fact identifying a corporate entity created without the individual’s knowledge or consent, and have no direct association to that individual, and,
     
  39. Whereas it is my understanding that the Statutes and Bylaws that are created by a Society or corporation are contractual and applicable only to those that are acting within that Society or corporation, and,
     
  40. Whereas it is my understanding those who have a SIN (Social Insurance Number) are in fact employees of the federal government and thus are bound by the statutes created by the federal government, and,
     
  41. Whereas it is my understanding that it is lawful to abandon one’s SIN, and,
     
  42. Whereas it is my understanding The Government of Canada is actually a corporation with the name CANADA (Central Index Key 0000230098) registered on the Securities Exchange Commission and its business Address is CANADIAN EMBASSY 1746 MASSACHUSETTS AVE NW WASHINGTON DC 20036, and,
     
  43. Whereas it is my understanding that the Government of Canada is not a nation as I thought it was, occupying a geographical location, but instead merely a corporation with de-facto authority, rather than lawful and,
     
  44. Whereas it is my understanding that the rightful, lawful owners of the lands and resources of the geographical landmass called Canada are in fact the indigenous (those born on that landmass) individuals of Canada, and not, in fact, the government or corporation CANADA, and,
     
  45. Whereas it is my understanding that the bounds of Common Law are simple and can be defined as: Do not harm another, Do not harm another’s property, Do not use mischief in contracts, and,
     
  46. Whereas it is my understanding people in Canada have a right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed, and,
     
  47. Whereas it is my understanding if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints, and,
     
  48. Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations, and,
     
  49. Whereas I, Paul-Maurice: Fiola am a Freeman-on-the-Land, and,
     
  50. Whereas it is my understanding the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both.

 

Therefore, be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I, Paul-Maurice: of the family Fiola do hereby state clearly, specifically and unequivocally my intent to peacefully and lawfully exist as a Freeman-on-the-Land, a Son of God, in full control of all affairs associated with myself and the legal entity FIOLA, PAUL MAURICE without any claim to joinder with said entity beyond that of secured creditor and agent in commerce, free of any and all restraints of any Act or Statute of CANADA as I am not an employee or agent of the corporation CANADA, bound only by Common Law, reserving all rights, and to conduct my private and commercial affairs to the net benefit of my community and myself.

 

The points that I have established in relation to my Understanding are gleaned from information found within the Acts and Statutes of CANADA and other commonwealth nations, as well as other official documents, and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 

 

Therefore I am now contacting the various government officials named above in the hopes that someone can either confirm or correct my understanding. If you do choose to respond with corrections, I must insist that you do so within Fourteen(14) days of service of this letter, in writing, by way of registered mail and provide proof of your claim, under oath or attestation with full commercial liability and penalty of perjury. A lack of response or response that does not contain proof of my mistaken understanding, on a point-by-point basis, will be assumed to imply agreement with my understanding. Failure to dispute the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence.

 

Due to the sensitive and serious nature of this matter I must respectfully demand that your response be in your own words, under oath and certified true and correct, and bound by the criminal code section 337 R.S., c. C-34, s. 297. I’m sure that you understand, after reading this notice, that the ramifications of error have very serious consequences. I certainly appreciate the duty you have undertaken and would like to thank you for you kind assistance in this matter. 

 

Sincerely and without prejudice, malice, afterthought, ill will, vexation or frivolity, all rights reserved,

 

Click for Map
sitemap | cookie policy | privacy policy