Login
Facebook
Get your free website from Spanglefish

Rigor, validity and standards of judgment

Issues concerning the rigor and validity of educational research are important yet variously understood.

This short video is a good introduction and the second goes into a bit more details

This is also a good outline of issues concerning rigour, validity and critique

 

If you go to Appendix 2 of Jack's 2005 keynote for the Act, Reflect, Revise III Conference, Brantford Ontario, Canada accessible from:
http://www.actionresearch.net/writings/arrkey05dr1.htm

You'll see that he describes Winters' 6 criteria for rigor in action research drawing on:

Winter, R., 1989. Learning From Experience. London; Falmer.

He also gives the url http://www.bath.ac.uk/~edsajw/peggy.shtml for Peggy (Kok) Leong's dissertation, which deals with validity really well:

Leong, K., 1991. Action Research: The Art of an Educational Inquirer. M.Ed. Dissertation. University of Bath.

Validity

In enhancing the validity of living theories I recommend the use of

Habermas, J. (1976) Communication and the evolution of society. London: Heinemann

Quotes can be accessed from here

Connelly's and Clandinin's (1990) point about validity criteria for narrative inquiry:

We think a variety of criteria, some appropriate to some circumstances and some to others, will eventually be the agreed-upon norm. It is currently the case that each inquirer must search for, and defend, the criteria that best apply to his or her work. (p.7)

(Connelly, F.M. & Clandinin, J. (1990) Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, Vol. 19, No.5, pp. 2-14.)

Criticisms about subjectivity and validity were met by references to Popper’s point about the significance of mutual rational control by critical discussion:

Now I hold that scientific theories are never fully justifiable or verifiable, but that they are nevertheless testable. I shall therefore say that objectivity of scientific statements lies in the fact that they can be inter-subjectively tested. The word ‘subjective’ is applied by Kant to our feelings of conviction (of varying degrees)…… I have since generalized this formulation; for inter-subjective testing is merely a very important aspect of the more general idea of inter-subjective criticism, or in other words, of the idea of mutual rational control by critical discussion. (Popper, 1975, p.44)

(Popper, K. (1975) The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London; Hutchinson

& Co.)

The validity of the explanations that constitute living-educational-theories are strengthening through the critical discussions in validation groups of between 3-8 peers with responses to questions derived from Habermas’ (1976) four criteria of social validity that include:

i)  How could I enhance the comprehensibility of my explanation?

ii) How could I strengthen the evidence I offer to justify the claims I make?

iii) How could I deepen and extend my sociohistorical and sociocultural understandings of their influence in my writings and practice?

iv) How could I enhance the authenticity of my explanation over time and interaction to show that I am truly committed to the values I claim give meaning and purpose to my life?

(Habermas, J. (1976) Communication and the Evolution of Society. London; Heinemann.)

Standards of judgment

Whitehead, J. (2000) The Living Standards of Practice and Judgement of Professional Educators. A paper produced while a visiting professor at Brock University, Ontario June 2000. Access from http://actionresearch.net/writings/stand/brst.html

Whitehead, J. (2000) Legitimising living standards of practice and judgement: How do I know that I have influenced you for good? A paper presented at the Third International Conference of the Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices Special Interest Group of the American Educational Research Association, 24-27 July, 2000, Herstmonceaux Castle, Surrey, U.K. Access from http://actionresearch.net/writings/writings/castleOK.doc

 

Rigour - Winter's

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95svPy7eczU

Click for Map
sitemap | cookie policy | privacy policy | accessibility statement