 Popular Alliance Staffordshire - www.popularalliancestaffs.org | sitemap | log in
|
 |
||
| This is a free Spanglefish 1 website. | ||
Farewell & ThanksReligion As A WeaponBanking, Bankers and GovernmentEU Arrogance - again !!Davie Goes To StrasbourgIndex TREASON IN WESTMINSTERby Craig Chapman - 07:25 on 13 February 2009* Popular Alliance does not recognise the European Union and its numerous treaties, documents and papers to have legal jurisdiction in the United Kingdom beyond of that of a basic trading agreement, as passed in the 1975 referendum. The European Union is viewed as a Potentate that can only extend its laws to our shores, were it to defeat our nation in war, or if the government gave the UK citizens the choice, in a specifically worded referendum. * Popular Alliance accuses all governments since 1970 of committing Treason, with various individuals also of accused of Sedition at Common Law and of Breaking the Official Secrets Act.
* Popular Alliance holds the Bill of Rights 1689 and the supplementary Act of Settlement 1701 as the British Constitution and therefore the Rule of Law in the United Kingdom.
* Popular Alliance accuses all other political parties that have taken part in European Union activities, of Misprision of Treason, for failing to report the crime of Treason to the due authorities.
* Popular Alliance will accuse any legal department that fails to seriously investigate the reported crime of treason, of Misprision of Treason. No political interference would be permitted to such a move, under the protection of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005.
TREASON IN WESTMINSTER – full formatHas this thought passed by you lately ?
“Wouldn’t it be nice if the United Kingdom had a Constitution, like the Americans, with which we could repel the European Union, which seem to be taking over every aspect of our lives ?”
Well, as it happens, the American Constitution was based upon our Bill of Rights 1688-89 and the supplementary Act of Settlement 1701, which were in turn based upon the Magna Carta, but also gave the people protective rights against a dictator-like Sovereign. So, we do have a British Constitution, a British Rule of Law, which very clearly states that, our Monarch and His/Her Administrators cannot surrender power to any leader, nation….. or potentate, unless as a result of losing a war. We have not lost a war since 1066 and yet our laws, statutes, taxes, standards and our whole livelihoods, are almost completely dominated by the European Union, a Potentate located in Brussels.
The very same Acts also state that the British People have the Right to Petition the Monarch. We have been denied that right by Gordon Brown’s government regarding the Lisbon Treaty, as the EU is given even more powers upon our shores and the Bill of Rights is considered “best forgotten.” In fact, a Government paper written by Aileen Walker on 29-11-99, regarding the Bill of Rights 1689, tries to disassociate the government of any responsibility to this very foundation of our legal system and laws over the last 400 years, and upon which many democratic nations around the world have based their own constitutions.
The Bill of Rights 1689 states that the act of surrendering power, unless in the case of losing a war, is an act of Treason. This is not some medieval waffle either; the writing links itself very well with current affairs and refers to changes that might be made over time too. Prime Ministers swear an Oath of Office to defend this nation and uphold its laws, not to hand it over and be taxed billions for that privilege. Tony Blair actually made an attempt to mothball the crime of Treason but did not manage to achieve quite that, perhaps, being a qualified lawyer, he was feeling some guilt ?
The European Union take-over started with Edward Heath and his colleague Douglas Hurd who presented a “Convenient Trading Agreement” to the British people with the European Communities Act 1972. In April 1970, as part of his campaign manifesto, Edward Heath said that further European integration would not happen, “except with the full-hearted consent of the Parliaments and peoples of the new member countries.” Despite this comment, no referendum was held when UK entered into the Common Market in 1973, by entering into an accession treaty on 22 January 1972 (with Denmark, Ireland, Norway) and passing the European Communities Act 1972 on 16 October 1972. The UK joined what would become the European Union with Denmark and Ireland on 1 January 1973.
In 1975, the next Labour government kept a manifesto pledge to hold a referendum, asking ”Should the UK stay in the European Community,” which passed as a “Yes” vote by 70-30% in a House of Commons referendum.
At the ensuing national refendum, the electorate were asked to vote on the direct question; "Do you think the United Kingdom should stay in the European Community (Common Market) ?"
Based upon the information they were given, every administrative county in the UK returned a majority of "Yes" votes, except in the Shetlands and Western Isles. Big money from industries and banks backed much of Labour's campaign for a "Yes" vote, whilst Industrial Minister Tony Benn led the "No" vote on a shoestring budget and with no media support. As ever, the "No" vote was labelled racist and Marxist, though many original "Yes" campaigners have since admitted that they were wrong, or misled at the time, including Margaret Thatcher and Rupert Murdoch.
Popular Alliance now holds copies of letters from that time that reveal a 30 year plan to fully integrate the United Kingdom into a European Super State.
We note that the referendum question, at no time asked the British public whether they wished to be governed by an overseas power, which would crush the existing British Constitution known as the Bill of Rights 1689. Since that time, the public has been repeatedly denied the opportunity to Petition the Monarch on this issue, therefore the Bill of Rights still legally stands as the Rule of Law upon our shores and any otherwise claim is one of Treason.
Since that time, several more papers have been signed by successive governments, Labour & Conservative, with the public repeatedly denied their right to Petition the Monarch. No-one in the UK, outside of parliament, under the age of 52 has been given any say on these matters and those beforehand were only given a snip of the real story, in a misrepresented referendum. We have been lied to and successive governments have broken their Oaths of Office.
No party since 1970 has voiced the intention to sign up to a European Union Constitution or Lisbon Treaty as part of their Election Manifesto pledges. If they intend such a major move (handing over law-making control), then it really should be the first item on their list of pledges.
Several Popular Alliance members are ex-military and we have been very careful so far not to include The Queen in our writings on European Union matters, however the Bill of Rights concludes that the power still sits with the Monarch, so it gives us no pleasure in suggesting that she has most likely been Deceived in Her Grant by the Privy Council and in more recent days by the likes of the office of the Ministry of Justice, and therefore she is possibly In Breach of Her Oath (Coronation Oath 1707). She has the power and responsibility to say “no” and also to ask the view of the citizens of this nation, but has failed to exercise them. This is, we agree, a terrible state of affairs and one which the British people must learn of and stand against.
We now have a situation where the Rule of Law (Bill of Rights and the supplementary Act of Settlement 1701) is in direct conflict with the acts of the Administrator (Prime Minister). In the Bill of Rights, the public has the Right to Petition the Monarch (referendum) and is being denied that by Her Administrators. We have a situation of Administrative Lawlessness and Interference with our Livelihoods and Freedoms. All of the above can then also be referred to in the Scottish Claim of Rights which states very similar details.
This is beyond all doubt, a case for the courts to investigate and a time for those upholding the law to be brave and resolute. There is already a situation where one police force is investigating both this case and also another police force for failing to act upon reports of treason, sedition at common law and the breaking the official secrets act, by successive governments. That police force is accused of Misprision of Treason and Serious Neglect of Duty. Naturally many police officers are fearful of getting involved, however the law of this land is held within the Bill of Rights 1689 and not in Brussels.
So, a crime has been committed, it should be reported and acted upon. The British Constitution Group ask that as many British citizens as possible do report this crime to their local police station, until such time that someone from within the British legal system has the courage to follow this through, in line with the Rule of Law of this land, which they are employed for and legally bound to uphold. The Constitution Reform Act 2005 invokes “A duty on government ministers to uphold the independence of the judiciary, barring them from trying to influence judicial decisions through any special access to judges.” Our police forces and courts should have no fear, as this Act protects them and allows them to do their jobs.
POPULAR ALLIANCE COMMENTSPopular Alliance is including these facts in our updated EU Policy. We do not recognise that the European Union has any legal jurisdiction upon our shores and we shall work our hardest to bring such details and facts to the public’s attention and through the courts to reach the right and just outcome, as described in our Rule of Law.
We hope that members of other UK political parties that oppose the EU, can work together to defeat Labour, Conservative and Lib-Dems as they find themselves completely entrenched in this treachery. Voting for any of these parties is voting for the EU. Some Conservatives may vocally oppose aspects of the EU, but it was their party that tricked the British people in the early 1970s. These days, all three main parties are controlled from within the EU and offer more or less the same policies. Any other worthwhile ideas they might have are wasted because EU rulings will simply brush them aside. Don’t be fooled by their empty promises.
Ironically anti-EU parties such as UKIP and Veritas have, or have had MEPs on their books, with the aim of “tearing the organisation part from the inside,” although neither has exactly excelled in that. This situation technically puts them in the position of sponsoring and co-operating with Treason and through having not made a legal case of it, they should really also be tried for Misprision of Treason. These days most UKIP members (and countless ex-members) are largely dissatisfied with the ineffectiveness of the party, and both they and the breakaway group Veritas, experience too much infighting to focus on the real problem at hand.
We are sure that Conservative, UKIP and Veritas have some good, well-intending people onboard, however they will not achieve their goals as things stand and therefore we call them to join Popular Alliance, a party with a full agenda of common sense policies in the British interests, that stands by its word and that has not been infiltrated by the European Union.
Popular Alliance is thankful to The British Constitution Group, who have researched much of the above information, how it is relevant and can be compared to the methods of the European Union.
Details and Examples of EU Law upon Our Shores
Successive Home Secretaries have made all manner of promises regarding immigration, quotas, human rights, and foreign prisoners’ rights etc, only to become disillusioned that they have no power to change anything. We are left with a long list of embarrassing climb downs and U-turns.
Weights & Measures. We are in the confusing position of having some items measured in both imperial and metric methods; meanwhile people are being prosecuted for offering sales in other outlawed imperial measures. Our government is powerless both to (i) bring some common sense to the table and (ii) make any definite changes until the EU approves them.
The EU Human Right’s Act, introduced by Tony Blair has given more power to those who break the law upon our shores. Again, our government and courts are powerless to act.
Our passports are property of the European Union. Our cars are registered to the DVLC which portrays the EU flag above the initials GB, in preference to our own national flag.
The Constitutional Reform Act of 2005 led to the responsibility of judicial appointments to be taken out of the hands of the Lord Chancellor and handed to the Queen, who is influenced by the Privy Council. The Privy Council is mainly made up of MPs who are members of parties that are influenced by the EU.
Regarding the Constitution Reform Act 2005, Popular Alliance detects levels of contradiction within its pages. Firstly, the government paper from 29th November 1999 tried to belittle the Bill of Rights 1689 as some quaint old paper of no relevance in the modern world, and yet 6 years later, the government has to write a Constitution Reform Act to overrule the sections regarding judicial appointments. This proves that the government does recognise the Bill of Rights 1689 as The British Constitution – when it suits them. This Act only includes judicial changes to the original Bill of Rights.
This is consistent with numerous government moves, in that British law is only the law when it suits them and the EU to recognise it as so. This Act takes away the appointments decision making of the judiciary and hands it to the Queen, who is then advised by the Privy Council. The Privy Council is made up of MPs who have political motives and are influenced by the EU. In this case, how can this paper support its own words in that no government can bring political influence over a judicial matter in law ? This Act goes around in circles, weakens the judiciary's position and Popular Alliance would look to expose and repeal its treachery.
Some quotes from The Bruges Group – which ironically includes some who originally favoured the 1970s Yes campaign but have since seen the error of their ways from positions deep inside government. They advise that an EU Constitution will:
Gordon Brown has now ratified the Lisbon Treaty, which has side-stepped our legal right to Petition the Monarch and her Administrators, by shoe-horning the above rulings (and many more) directly into our lives, by sneakily amending previously passed papers. Our government and the EU leaders know that they would be voted down in a democratic referendum on our shores – as promised in the last Labour manifesto. In fact Labour had no right to offer that referendum in the eyes of the EU. The Lisbon Treaty is similar to buying an upgrade package to an existing computer programme, instead of buying the updated programme. It gets the user the same result for a much lower price.
The Bruges Group go on to ask….
How many people are aware, for instance, that it is now Brussels, not London or any other national government, which makes our laws on how we dispose of our rubbish, on food safety, on how many hours we can work, on how company accounts have to be drawn up?
How many people know that it is Brussels which dictates which seed varieties we are allowed to plant in our gardens; which prescribes, down to the minutest detail, how we can make buses and cars; which lays down the height of our office chairs, the design of our fire exit notices, the exact permissible measurements of destination displays in our trains?
It is thanks to our joining that mere 'Common Market' 30 years ago that we have seen the near-destruction of our fishing industry, once the largest in Europe; that many of our farmers, until 1973 the most successful in Europe, today wonder how much longer they can survive.
It is thanks to the EU that millions of businesses are now stifled by an unending avalanche of costly red tape; while even the City of London now fears that a flood of new directives from Brussels could before long cost it its place as the leading financial centre in the world.
Step by step we have seen our politicians handing over to this weird new system of government control over almost every aspect of our national life, from the power to decide who can come to live and work in Britain to the way our judges now have to interpret the law in our courts.
Craig Chapman
Popular Alliance
8th February 2009
References
The Bill of Rights 1688-89
The Act of Settlement 1701
European Communities Act 1972
The Constitution Reform Act 2005
Add your comment Please note that whenever you submit something which may be publicly shown on a website you should take care not to make any statements which could be considered defamatory to any person or organisation. |    |
|
 | ||