SpanglefishNORTHERN SKIES | sitemap | log in
This is a free Spanglefish 1 website.

LUNAR

“Whole-face” images of the Moon using digital cameras.

The Moon is both relatively simple and rewarding to image with basic digital cameras. A combination of large zoom and image stabilizers allows one to achieve hand-held camera images of fair quality, even on auto settings.

However, imaging through the telescope or a large binocular can prove more problematical. One requires focal lengths of at least 600mm in order to achieve moderate, detail especially for medium and smaller craters. Imaging through the eyepiece can be relatively easy with some cameras with smaller diameter lenses but it can often be a hit and miss affair.

Single lens reflex (SLR) cameras, on the other hand, are not suitable for use with a telescope even if you have the necessary lens attachment to enable the camera to be mounted at the prime focus. Not only is the image small, compared to when magnified via an eyepiece, but also the camera mechanism will transmit vibrations from the shutter release, unless the apparatus is mounted on a very sturdy tripod.

For “whole” image photography of the Moon we have tended to achieve by photographing though the telescope eyepiece using small, handheld cameras.

More recently we have used Nikon (Nikkor) 600mm and 800mm manual telephoto lenses attached to a heavy-duty EQ6 equatorial mounting. These lenses, when stopped down to f/16 with above average ISO settings, can give fine, detailed images at shutter speeds of around 1/500 second. An example is given below using a 800mm focal length lens in combination with a 2x converter.

It is possible to pick up S/H such lenses at prices well below equivalent aperture apochromatic triplet telescopes.

2014 September 11, 22h 45m UT. Nikkor 800mm f/5.6 with 2x converter and stopped down to f/11. A 1/500 sec. exposure D300 SLR ISO 2000. Note the sharp, bright image of crater Proclus close to the western limb. (Left click to enlarge.) Note: Some loss of detail in this medium resolution image.

Detail for Proclus:

Dimension: 29x29Km (17x17Miles)

Height: 2400m (7300ft)

Height/Wide ratio: 0,0857

 

JM 2014 September 12.

 

The Bright Crater Aristarchus.

 

We occasionally receive requests for specific information via the Guestbook page, by email and by telephone. One query that has cropped up a number of times over the years refers to a bright “spot” on the near-full Moon visible to the unaided eye. The “spot” referred to is seen close to the terminator (image below) and is in fact the crater named after the revolutionary observer and thinker Aristarchus.

 

This crater is the brightest feature on the lunar surface and may be glimpsed when the Moon is in the early first quarter phase and Aristarchus is lit not by direct sunlight but by sunlight reflected via the Earth (the so-called earthshine).

 

2014 May 11at 21h 01m. 100mm achromat. imaged through the eyepise at 45x F200 Minolta Dimage digital camera 1/500 sec. ISO 400. (Left click to enlarge image.)

 

A finer view is shown in the image on this page for 2013 January 23, 20h 23m UT.

 

Another interesting crater close by is Herodotus. Readers may be interested to look these two names up online for more information on the persons themselves.

 

 

2014 May 07: RUPES RECTA (“Straight Wall”)

 

We discussed this formation in connection with an observation made on January 09 this year (see below) using a modest 100mm f/9 apochromatic doublet. Compare the data for the two observations. It will be seen that the phase for May 07 is considerably less than for January 09, making for more tricky exposure times etc.

 

 

A brief period of clear sky in the late evening of May 07 gave promise of good, steady seeing and excellent transparency. As we have mentioned, astronomical twilight now lasts throughout the 24 hour period here in Orkney and so this limits us somewhat where the observation of faint objects is concerned (galaxies and comets for example).

 

It was the intention to re-collimate the 200mm f/8 Ritchey Chretien and so waiting for fading twilight that would allow the observation of stars to magnitude 3 or thereabouts, we filled in the time observing the Moon with a 180mm f/15 Maksutov.

 

This evening afforded another promising opportunity to have Rupes Recta close to the terminator. Illumination is always weak on the light side close to the terminator affording some difficulty recording this feature with modest equipment. Moreover, the lunar phase is critical for shadow effects best suited to show up the delicate nature of the surrounding area and the scarp (“wall”) itself.

 

The results are shown below:

 

2014 May 07, 20h 37m. 200mm Maksutov 60x, imaged through the eyepiece using a Cannon IXUS 310 HS small digital camera. Exposure 1/640sec. ISO 800. (Left click to enlarge image.)

 

2014 May 07, 20h 33m. 180mm Maksutov 360x, imaged through the eyepiece using a Cannon IXUS 310 HS small digital camera. Exposure 1/80 sec. ISO 800.

 

Lunar data at time of observation,

 

Constellation: Leo

Phase: 57%

Phase angle: 82.0°

Elongation: 97.9°

Diameter: 1795.87"

Right ascension: 9h 42.3m

Declination: +8° 01'

 

Altitude: 35° 7' 35"

Azimuth: 212° 25'

Hour angle: 1h 45m

Rise: 11h 25m

Transit: 18h 46m

Set: 1h 33m

 

The Moon whilst waiting for the Aurora!

 

(Note: The COMET & SKY VIEW pages may be worth a visit.)

 

2014 January 09. Lunar Observations with 100mm f/9 apochromatic doublet. Mount: SkyWatcher EQ3: manual drive in R.A. Camera Canon IXUS310 exposures through the eyepiece (20mm & 12mm) from 1/200 to 1/500 sec ISO 800. Full disc shows Rupes Recta area circled and highlighted.

 

The SkyWatcher 100mm f/9 apochromatic refracting telescope would be the telescope I should recommend to an advanced beginner to observational astronomy. Prior to that, I would have suggested a good pair of binoculars (8x40) and for the owner to become well acquainted with the night sky—this would include an understanding of diurnal and annual motions in order to account for the seasonal appearance of the constellations, the apparent motion of the Moon and so on.

 

 

This is the best way to appreciate the capabilities of a telescope, for without this grounding one may be disappointed with what can be seen and imaged through a telescope of any aperture. As a visitor to University of London Observatory, Mill Hill, remarked to me when seeing Mars for the first time through our 210mm Cooke refracting telescope: “Is that the lot?!”

 

I graduated from the smallest to some of the largest refracting telescopes, and at each stage managed to cover a comprehensive programme of work on double stars. Between times I would view the Moon and planets where appropriate. The Moon tended to excite me the most for its vast range of detail that was ever changing.

 

Leading up to the evening and night of January 9th this year there had been a good deal of general media coverage for an anticipated display of the aurora. The Sun had been showing a good deal of activity in many regions both visual and in other ranges of the spectrum. The first really large sunspot group (large enough to be seen with the eye using filters for protection) of the current solar maxima had been on disc since January 1st.

 

A few days later we had further indications that an aurora might be seen over the forthcoming nights. The main obstacle to viewing the aurora, apart from interference from cloud, was the waxing Moon at a phase of  68%+ on the evening and night of the 9th.

 

Predicting an auroral display is by no means an easy exercise; in addition to observational data from telescopes and magnetometers, a certain amount of judgement is required, and this can only be achieved through long experience in the field. Frankly, we put the chances of an outstanding display at less than 50%.

 

On the night there was plenty of fast moving cloud to accompany the Moon well placed for observation in Aries at declination +13°.5 and therefore well above the celestial equator—far from ideal auroral watch stuff. The cloud remained broken for much of the early night carried, as it was, on a strong NW wind. This provided a good opportunity for some “recreational” lunar observing with the 100mm refractor, whilst at the same time keeping an eye on the northern sector of sky for any signs of the aurora. As the wind eased so the cloud cover became more extensive before midnight—time to call it a day!

 

However, the Lunar observations went well. At phase 68% the terminator is well positioned for seeing Rupes Recta (The Straight Wall) and its surroundings. In fact, the results (a sample given below) are some of the best we have ever achieved of this feature using a small telescope. It should be noted that this is a fault in the floor of the mare and not a wall as such (“cliff “would be more accurate in common parlance ).  The crater to the left of the fault is BIRT.

 

2014 January 09, 19h 50m UT. 100mm f/9 apoochromatic refractor: 20mm eyepiece: Canon IXUS310 digital camera. (Low zoom.) Left click to enlarge.

 

2014 January 09, 20h 24m UT.100mm f/9 apoochromatic refractor: 12mm eyepiece: Canon IXUS310 digital camera. (Full zoom.) Left click to enlarge.

 

Data for Moon at second observation:

Phase: 67.2%

Phase angle: 69.9°

Elongation: 110.0°

Diameter: 1846.59"

 

Constellation: Aries

 

Right ascension: 2h 28.3m

Declination: +13° 35'

 

Altitude: 43° 2'

Azimuth: 200° 44'

Hour angle: 1h 2m

Rise: 11h 36m  

Transit: 19h 21.6m

Set: 2h 9m

 

 

Rupes Recta is situated in the Mare Imbrium. Data for this and other futures proximal to the “wall” are tabulated below: the reader may gauge the resolution of this image from the data.

 

 

MARE NUBIUM: “Sea of Clouds” named by Riccioli (1651)

Geological period: Pre-Nectarian. (From -4.55 billions years to -3.92

billions years)

 

Size:

Dimension: 772x772Km / 454x454Mi

 

Description:

Lengthened North South formation.

254 000 km2.

Separated in two similar parts by

Promontorium Taenarium.

Contains few wrinkle ridges and

rilles.

 

Observation period: 1 day after

First Quarter or Last Quarter

Minimal Instrument: 10x

binoculars

 

Position:

Longitude: 15.0° West

Latitude: 10.0° South

Quadrant: South-West

Area: Mare Humorum region

 

 

RUPES RECTA

 

Type: Scarp

Geological period: Imbrian (From

-3.85 billions years to -3.2 billions

years) ?

 

Dimension: 114x114Km / 67x0Mi

Height: 300m / 900ft

Height/Wide ratio: 0,0027

 

Description:

Rectilinear fault situated on the

East bank of Mare Nubium.

Connects Thebit D to the North with

a small mountain to the South.

Slope inclined to 7° only.

Slope covered with bright materials.

 

BIRT

 

Type: Crater

Geological period: Copernician

(From -1.1 billions years to present

days) ?

 

Dimension: 17x17Km / 10x10Mi

Height: 3470m / 10500ft

Height/Wide ratio: 0,2041

 

Description:

Isolated circular formation with bowl

shape situated on the bank of Mare

Nubium.

Pretty steep slopes supporting Birt

A to the South-East Rima Birt and

Birt F to the West and the

craterlets Birt K J and H to the

South-West.

Pretty high walls.

Rounded floor.

 

ROUSAY SCHOOL Lunar Project:

This term Rousay School pupils, as part of their space studies, will be making observations of the Moon’s apparent motion/phases etc. We will include from time to time their comments along with some images we have taken at Springfield.

February

2013 February 25: Full Moon!

The “flattened”, rising full moon “sitting” on the hills of Eday as seen from Springfield, Rousay 2013 February 25th at 17h 47m UT. The flattening effect is due to refraction by the Earth’s atmosphere which, at this low altitude (54 arc-minutes), appears to raise the lower limb to a significantly greater altitude than the top limb.

Imaged 2013 February 25 at 19h 34m UT. 120mm apochromatic refractor, Canon: IXUS 310HS. (Left click to enlarge.)

Full Moon occurred at 20h 26m UT on February 25th. The phase was 98%. Not full, then? No, but as close to full as was possible within this lunation. Careful examination of the image will show shadowing at certain regions of the Moon’s limb. To be “absolutely” full, the Moon would be opposite the Sun in the sky as seen from earth and in the same line and plane, in other words a total lunar eclipse.

The full significance of these variations will be featured in an article to appear next month.

 

 

2013 February 18:

2013 February 18. Daylight and Evening Observations of the Moon.

2013 February 18, 16h 24m. 180mm Maksutov 80x:. F200 Minolta.

2013 February 18, 18h 13m. 180mm Maksutov 500x:. IXUS 310HS.

Interesting features to note: the prominence of the various mountains on the Mare Ibrium floor. Two examples are given below. (Ringed in top photograph.)

MARE IMBRIUM

Type: “Sea”
Geological period: Lower Imbrian (From -3.85 billions years to -3.8 billions years)

Size:
Dimension: 1287x1287Km / 757x757Mi
Height: ?
Height/Wide ratio: Unknown height. Impossible calculation.

Description:
Very large formation. Second lunar “sea”. 830 000 km2. Very flat floor with numerous wrinkle ridges to the periphery.

Observation:
Interest : Very interesting formation
Observation period: 2 days after First Quarter or 1 day after Last
Quarter
Minimal Instrument: 10x binoculars

Name Origin:
Detailed Name: “Sea of Showers”
Name Author: Riccioli (1651)
Name by Langrenus: Mare Austriacum
Name by Hevelius: Lacus Marinus
MONS PICO

Type: Mountain
Geological period: Imbrian (From -3.85 billions years to -3.2 billions
years) ?

Size:
Dimension: 26x26Km / 15x9Mi
Height: 2400m / 7300ft
Height/Wide ratio: 0,096

Description:
Lengthened and South-East North-West oriented mountain. Isolated
summit emerging from the lava of Mare Imbrium. Mountain Beta equally
isolated to the South.

MONS PITON

Type: Mountain
Geological period: Imbrian (From -3.85 billions years to -3.2 billions
years) ?

Size:
Dimension: 26x26Km / 15x15Mi
Height: 2250m / 6800ft
Height/Wide ratio: 0,09

Note also the sunlight catching the upper east wall of the large circular crater Plato..

PLATO

Type: Walled plain
Geological period: Upper Imbrian (From -3.8 billions years to -3.2 billions years)

Size:
Dimension: 104x104Km / 61x61Mi
Height: 0
Height/Wide ratio: 0,0099

Description:
Circular formation crushing the chain of Alps. Transient lunar phenomena (clouds in 1871).
Pretty steep slopes supporting Platon G to the East.
Few high walls with 2000 m summits and a colapsed part to the West.
Immense flat floor filled with sombre lava. Clear spots and craterlets.

Name Origin:
Detailed Name: Plato
5 th century BC Greek Philosopher born in Greece
Born at: Athenes in 428 
Dead at: Athçnes in 347
Founder of the Academy. Has written 28 'Dialogues' and many 'Letters'. Philosophy making the synthesis between the rationalism and the spiritualism. Believed in spherical stars
Name Author: Riccioli (1651)
Name by Langrenus: Lacus Panciroli
Name by Hevelius: Lacus Niger Major

 

2013 February 17:

2013 February 17 19h 24m UT. Maksutov 180mm f/15. power 85x: Canon IXUS 310HS, exp. 1/500 sec. ISO 800.

2013 February 17 19h 28m UT. Maksutov 180mm f/15. power 150x: Canon IXUS 310HS, exp. 1/500 sec. ISO 1000.

2013 February 17. Maksutov 180mm f/15. power 150x: Canon IXUS 310HS, exp. 1/125 sec. ISO 1000.

Data for Observation for 2013 February 17, 19h 25m UT:

Constellation: Taurus
Altitude: 46° 47' 0"
Azimuth: 209° 17' 1"

Magnitude: -10.1
Phase: 49.7%
Elongation: 89.5°
Diameter: 1799.67"

Physical data etc.:

Attention should be paid to the region occupied by the named feature STOFLER. This is a contraction (alteration) from the German Johann Stöffler (see below)

Type: Walled plain
Geological period: Pre-Nectarian (From -4.55 billions years to -3.92 billions years)

Size:
Dimension: 129x129Km / 76x76Mi
Height: 0
Height/Wide ratio: 0,0222

Description:
Damaged circular formation.
Pretty steep slopes supporting Fernelius to the North Stofler K to the North-West and Stofler D to the
South-West.
Pretty high walls supporting Stofler F to the South-West and crushed by Faraday Faraday P and Faraday C
to the South-East.
Immense flat floor with Faraday N lengthened to the East. Craterlets. Somber stains.

Name Origin:
Detailed Name: Johann Stöffler
15 th century German Mathematician and astronomer born in Germany
Born at: ? in 1452
Dead at: ? in 1534
Name Author: Riccioli (1651)
Name by Langrenus: Not named
Name by Hevelius: Mons Calchistan
Name by Riccioli: Stofler


Note: Air stability (“seeing”) was good, but transparency poor for these observations.

 

2013 Feb. 11, 18h 02m UT. 100mm achromat. 45x: 1/20 sec ISO 400 Minolta Dimage F200.

Constellation: Aquarius
Altitude: 7° 50' 13"
Azimuth: 249° 35' 4"
Hour angle: 4h 34m 2s
Rise: 7h 41m 36s
Transit: 13h 19m 31s
Set: 19h 13m 27s

Magnitude: -5.9
Phase: 0.029
Age: 34h 40m
Elongation: 19.4°
Diameter: 1909.85"

 

January

The sequence of lunar images below taken in the evening are of varying quality (the 100mm achromat is inferior optically to the apochromatics and Maksutovs) but serve to show the progressive increase in phase. It is unusual to have consecutive clear evenings here in Orkney to enable such work! (Note: NOT all images may enlarge.)

2013 January 28 Detailed Observations with 180mm Maksutov:

2013 Janaury 28, 22h 43m UT. 150mm f/15 Maksutov.

2013 Janaury 28, 22h 52m UT. 150mm f/15 Maksutov.showing Marium Crisium region.

NOTE:The above two images are laterally inverted.

Features of note.

1 The regular, eliptal dark area on the terminetor known as Mare Crisium (Sea of Crises).

Geological period: Nectarian (From -3.92 billions years to -3.85 billions years)

Size:
Dimension: 638x638Km (375x345miles)
Height: ?
Height/Wide ratio: Unknown height. Impossible calculation.

Description:
Formation with crater shape lengthened west to east. Very flat floor with ring of wrinkled ridge to the periphery and “ghost”
craters to the south. Craterlets. 176 000 km2. 3.85 billion years old.

Name Origin:
Detailed Name: Sea of Crises (now in current usage)
Named by Riccioli (1651)
Also:
Named by Langrenus: Mare Caspium
Named by Hevelius: Palus Maseotis
Named by Riccioli: Mare Crisium

2 The bright, rayed crater on the eastern limb named Proclus. This is one of the brightest craters on the Moon.

Detail for Proclus:

Geological period: Copernician (From -1.1 billions )

Size:
Dimension: 29x29Km (17x17Miles)
Height: 2400m (7300ft)
Height/Wide ratio: 0,0857

Named after:
Proclus Diadochus
5 th century Greek Philosopher born in Greece
Born at: Constantinople in 412AD
Died at: Athçnes in 485AD
Important Facts: Director of Neoplatonician school in 452. Authors of the 'Elements of theology'.

Full Moon (or a little past!)

There will be a special feature on full Moon shortly.

2013 January 27, 21h 08m UT: (16h 30m past full Moon).

2013 January 23, 20h 23m UT. 180mm f/15 Maksutov, Minolta F200. (Left click to enlarge.)

Note the brilliantly lit eastern wall of the crater Aristarchus on the terminator.

Essential data for this crater:

Geological period:

Copernician (From -1.1 billions years)

Size:

Dimension: 41x41Km  (24x24 miles)
Height: 3000m  (9100ft)
Height/Wide ratio: 0,075

Name Origin:

3 rd century BC greek Astronomer born in Greece
Born at: Samos in 310 BC
Died at: Samos in 230 BC

Important Facts: Inventor of the heliocentric theory and a method of distance calculation of the Sun and the Moon.
 

2013 Janaury 22, 18h 26m UT. 180mm f/15 Maksutov. Cannon IXUS 310HS. 1/1000 sec ISO.800,

2013 January 21, 21h 12m UT. 100mm achro..

2013 Janausy 20, 18h 51m UT. 100mm Achromatic refractor.

2013 January 18, 17h 40m UT. 100mm achromatic refractor.

2013 January 17, 16h 44m UT. 180mm f/15 Maksutov.

2013 January 16, 16h 44m UT. 180mm f/15 Maksutov.

The Moon imaged 2013 January 15 at 16h 39m UT. Note the sunlit point on the northern rim of  MARE CRISIUM. (Left click to enlarge.)

Instrument: 180mm f/15 Maksutov, Camera Canon IXUS 310HS (exp. 1/200 sec. ISO1600.

Data for Moon (2013 January 15, 16h 40m UT):

Magnitude: -8.3
Phase: 0.190
Phase angle: 128.4°
Elongation: 51.5°
Diameter: 1900.10"
Light time: 0h 0m 1.3s
Mass: 7.3483e+022 kg (0.0123 x Earth)
Mean equatorial radius: 1734.4 km (0.2719 x Earth)
Maximum angular diameter: 1864.2"
Minimum geocentric distance: 0.00257 AU
Geometric flattening: 0
Sidereal rotation period: 27d 7h 43m 11s 
Mean density: 3.34 g/cm^3
Geometric albedo: 0.12

 

2013 January 14: The "ageing" New Moon imaged at 17h 12m UT. 100mm achromat. A companion to the image below (2012 December 10) which shows the Moon heading into "old age" at the other end of the lunar phase cycle - the lunar month.

***

2012 December 10: Commencement of the LUNAR early morning "run" passing planets Saturn. Venus and Mercury.

Moon imaged 2012 Dec. 10 at 07h 05m UT. 180mm f/15 Maksutov: Minolta F200 at the eyepiece (56mm wide angle). Left click to enlarge.

Morning Sky 2012 December 10.

We were fortunate in having a relatively clear early morning on December 10 with the “silvery” crescent Moon appearing below Saturn with, at various intervals between scattered cloud breaks, views of Mercury Venus and the bright, white star Spica (above and to the right of the Moon).

The Moon presented an interesting spectacle with the crater Reiner on the terminator and looking like an intense black “dot” (on small images) in contrast to its surroundings. (Location approximately mid-terminator). Additionally, there was a grazing occultation with the star eta Virginis (Mag. 4.8 to 5.0) at 07h 10m UT that showed well in small telescopes.

Data for crater REINER:

Type: Crater
Geological period: Eratosthenian (From -3.2 billions
years to -1.1 billions years)

Size:
Dimension: 31x31Km / 18x18Mi
Height: 2580m / 7800ft
Height/Wide ratio: 0,086

Description:
Isolated circular formation to the South of the field of
domes of Marius.
Pretty steep slopes.
High walls.

Jupiter in close conjunction with the Moon, 2012 July 15

100mm achromatic refractor, Minolta Dimage F200, 1/90 sec. ISO 400

Jupiter in close conjunction with the Moon, 2012 July 15 at 02h 09m UT, approximately 10 minutes before closest approach (cloud prevented imaging at this instant). Considering the recent continuous cloud cover we were fortunate to see the event, which we did over a period of over 1 hour. See GALLERY page.

.

 

The interesting crater formation DELAUNAY.

In this relatively low resolution image the crater appears to be  divided almost in half by what looks like a thin, straight wall. Higher resolution imaging reveals the true nature of the formation to be quite irregular in fact. This observation emphasises the importance of incident light values when interpreting lunar detail. Imaged John C Vetterlein, 2012 March 30 at 19h 52m UT. 178mm f/15 Maksutov 300x and Canon IXUS 310HS. A 1/200 sec exposure ISO 800. (Left click to enlarge image.)

Location for crater DELAUNAY (ringed). 

Full Moon at Perigee

An inspection of a table for the Moon’s perigee in 2012 reveals that the event on May 06 has our natural satellite at a distance of 356955 km compared to 369886 km on Jan 17. This equates to an apparent diameter for the Moon of 33' 28" and 32' 18" respectively. Interesting in itself, but when one looks more closely at the data for May 06 we find that Full Moon occurs within less than 2 minutes of perigee itself.

This struck me at once and so I made a quick survey of the coincidence of perigee and full moon over a period of 20 years and found nothing to compare with 2012 May 06. I contacted Jean Meeus, a well known authority on astronomical algorithms, who supplied me with a short table of incidences of full moon close to perigee between 1972 Nov. 20 and 2034 Nov. 25 as shown in the following table. [All times reduced to Universal Time (UT).]

Date             Full Moon    Perigee    Dif. (minutes)

1972 Nov 20     23:07      24:02            55
1992 Jan 19      21:28      22:13            45
2011 Mar 19     18:10      19:09             59
2012 May 06     03:35      03:34              1
2013 Jun 23      11:32      11:12            20
2014 Aug 10     18:09      17:43            26
2034 Nov 25     22:32      22:05            27

One should state before we go any further that modern Lunar Theory has advanced considerably over recent years thereby rendering it possible to make predictions over a substantial period of time that would have been impossible 100 years ago.

I decided to extend Jean’s analysis to cover the period between 1900 and 2121 (an interval of 221 years). Having done this I then contacted Jean again who verified my results for the most important events as follows:

Date          Full Moon        Perigee        Dif. (minutes.)

1912 Jan   04  13:30     Jan 04  13:34        4 (6 min.)
1953 Sep  23  04:16     Sep 23  04:26      10 (11 min.)
2012 May 06  03:35      May 06 03:34        1
2095 Oct  13  09:31      Oct 13  09:26        5 (3 min.)
2114 Dec 12  06:20       Dec 12  06:35      15

Figures in brackets are from Jean Meeus himself. The concordance will be seen to be very good.

In my analysis the original table of concordances for the 221 year period amounted to over 300 hundred entries with differences in the two events amounting to no more than 10 hours. The five dates given in the above table stood out from the rest indicating that the 2012 May 06 is exceptional by any standard.

The fact that on 2012 May 06 as seen from the UK the Moon will be in a twilight sky, and within an hour of setting, is to an extent unfortunate but insignificant compared to the juxtaposition of the two events themselves.

I should like to thank Jean Meeus for his prompt and helpful input to this investigation.

Appearance of Full Moon at Perigee and Apogee compared.

JCV

2012 March 20

Larrieu’s dam” imaged 2011Oct. 16, 03h 56m UT.

This feature is well worth close study under changing light over the course of hours or a few days. (see: JBAA Vol. 44 No. 6 June 2008.)

 
Area within square shown (above) and below in high magnification with the "dam" ringed in the second image.
 

These images were obtained quite fortuitously when testing a Canon IXUS 310 HS compact digital camera in combination with a William Optics 132mm f/7 apochromatic triplet refractor. (Note: images are inverted.)

The conditions were far from ideal at the time for, despite the moon being high in the sky, the seeing quality was poor with extreme dew level causing fogging of lenses in a very short space of time.

JCV

2011 October 19

CLAVIUS

Crater Clavius and surroundings 2011 April 12, 20h 15m UT. 120mm apochromatic refractor through the eyepiece with Minolta Dimage F200.

Image quality tests.

ONE

Comparison between images recorded through the eyepiece using a Minolta Dimage F200 camera and a Nikon D300 SLR at the prime focus of the same instrument - a 120mm f/7.5 SkyWatcher apochromatic refractor.

2011 January 16, 17h 15m UT. Dimage F200 through the eyepiece at 45x.

2011 January 16, 17h 28m UT. Dimage F200 through the eyepiece at 90x and 3x optical zoom.

2011 January 16, 17h 34m UT. Nikon D300 SLR at the prime focus.

TWO

Interesting comparisons using a) A 100mm f/9 apochromatic refractor, the Moon imaged through the eyepice using a Minolta Dimage F200 at ISO 100. Magnification 80x, shutter 1/50 sec.

a) 2011 January 09, 17h 19m UT.

and b) Nikkor 600mm  f/4 with 2x converter, ISO 800 at 1/400 sec. D300 SLR.

b) 2011 Jnaury 09, 18h 42m UT. (Both images JCV.)

The Moon, imaged in poor transparency, 2010 December 26 at 07h 29m UT. Nikkor 300mm f/4.5 with 2x converter D300 in monochrome. Exposure 1/640 sec. ISO400. Note: comparatively little camera shake using the MC-30 cable connection for shutter activation. Even so, this image is inferior in terms of sharpness to that obtained with a 80mm f/7.5 apohromatic refracting telescope imaged through the eyepiece using a Minolta Dimage F300, the finest camera ever produced for this technique and long unobtainable except via S/H sources. The F200, with lower resolution than the F300, is also a fine camera and has the advantage of a more responsive shutter activation.

The Nikon D300 works well at low ISO values, both for lunar work and star fields. Anything above ISO800 gives unacceptable noise levels difficult to eradicate even with the NR camera processing. This camera provides a plethora of settings most of which are unsuitable for astronomical work involving exposures longer than 1 second. This matter will be treated in greater detail later.

JCV
26/12/10

The Moon imaged 2005 December 08, 16h 55m UT. 175mm Maksutov and Dimage D200 through the eyepice at 74x. (JCV)

Moons and Satellites—a little matter of Nomenclature.

We shall reserve the word "moon" for the Earth’s natural satellite. Any other item in orbit about the Earth will be referred to in general as an artificial satellite to the Earth. Similar objects in orbit around other planets of the Solar System will likewise be named as artificial satellites to the body in question. Man-devised vehicles in orbits around the Sun will be variously referred to as probes, space vehicles etc., depending upon the mission (another word frequently to be found in contemporary space science/technology usage).

As we are dealing with word usage it should be pointed out that in general the Moon and the Sun have a capital letter, even though some might argue that the preceding definite article (the) is qualification in itself.

In astronomy we have become more aggressive (assertive?). Thus, we now "target" objects rather than "study" them; we "patrol" for rather than "search" for hitherto unknown items, and so on. And of course some will insist that it ALL started with a bang*!

Why this display of pedantry? Put it down to a whipping I had at school from the science master when I had said something on the lines of "the moons of Jupiter". His approach was that "no student of his should use such baby talk."

John (C) Vetterlein

See: Big Bang - Fact or Fiction?

 

 

Click for Map
sitemap | cookie policy | privacy policy