westminster ferret
Jewish doctor’s open letter denounces John Mann’s ‘attention-seeking’ claims of anti-Semitism
20
Thursday
Oct 2016
Posted by Mike Sivier in Uncategorized
≈ 4 Comments
livingstone3
John Mann (right), accompanied improbably by a camera crew, accosts Ken Livingstone on a stairwell. I used the image as the cover of a book which analyses Mr Mann’s claims.
This Writer is grateful to Dr Sam Glatt for his letter as it had not previously registered that John Mann wants to drum me out of the Labour Party for showing a certain amount of intelligence, reason and good judgment in the case of Jackie Walker.
Mr Mann could just as easily have called for my expulsion after I published The Livingstone Presumption (see also the advert at the bottom of this article), I suppose, which addressed his unreasonable attack on Ken Livingstone and the issues surrounding it. I used the image above as the basis for the book’s cover. I strongly urge everyone who disagrees with Mr Mann to pick up a copy (I have deliberately made them inexpensive).
I found the following on Michael Rosen‘s Facebook page. Please feel free to circulate it further:
This letter is being circulated. It comes from a doctor who is 90 years old, Jewish and in the Labour Party. It’s addressed to John Mann MP
“Dear Mr Mann, 18/10/2016
It is with a sense of deep distaste personally, and an even deeper concern for the future of our freedom of speech, generally, that I have viewed your recent antics. In my opinion, your behaviour appears both narcissistic and attention-seeking, in the extreme. Whether it is at a level at which one could view it as pathological, I am not sufficiently qualified to say, but it is my view that ‘the man on the Clapham omnibus’ may, reasonably, harbour suspicions.
Your ambush of Ken Livingstone, with pre-arranged media presence is a case in point. Any less reasonable man may have told you to ‘clear off’. Instead he tried, in a calm manner, to point out the historical evidence to support what he had said. His words fell on (your) deaf ears, for you, of course, had decided already that he ‘would float if you threw him in the river’ (the test applied, historically, vis a vis witchcraft). Cynical observers too, may, possibly, take the view that you are attempting, on behalf of others, to airbrush history, in the name of anti-Semitism.
John Mann at the centre of an ‘anti-Semitic storm’ despite not being Jewish!
Are you not aware of the potential of historical resonance here? Let’s, for the sake of argument, turn history on its head and assume that the Nazis had won WW2. You can imagine, can you not, that they would want to stamp out any reference to the ‘Final Solution’? After all, political opponents in actual historical fact had already gone to the extermination camps, along with the mentally ill, those with learning difficulty, Roma and the Jewish community. So, one might imagine that the Nazis might encourage the denunciation of those who would wish to speak the truth, as ‘Jew lovers’ and make them targets for ‘neutralisation’. Do you take my point? Thankfully, such a situation never came about, thanks to the sacrifice of over 400,000 people, including my own brother, (and many more from other nations) who gave their lives to preserve our freedom of speech.
Let me now refer to matters In connection with Jackie Walker, the former vice-chair of Momentum and with whom we share membership of the Labour Party. I do not wish to refer to the specifics of the matter as her appeal against suspension from the Party is pending, (although the issue of the circumstances of her ‘entrapment’ and ‘denunciation’, are deeply worrying to me). However, your comments that all Labour members who supported her “should be expelled from the Party,” which were reported in the media, absolutely appalled me. The implied ‘guilt by association’ is akin to the ‘fellow traveller’ accusations made during the McCarthyite era in the USA. Shame on you.
There seems to be a desire, on your part, to conflate (i.e. run together as if they represent the same meaning), the words and concepts of anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism. Or perhaps you are just confused? I never have been. To me anti-Zionism represents political opposition to a style of social and political expression stemming from a particular religious interpretation of Judaism. Anti-Semitism, on the other hand, refers to a dislike of Jews, which is rooted in the same xenophobic soil as other forms of racism. When this is openly displayed, we, in Britain have anti-discrimination laws, including those relating to hate speech. Now…the application of and efficacy of our legislation is a matter open for debate and is something you can, potentially, influence as an MP. Why then, at this present time, are you focusing your attention on the Labour Party?
That brings me to the issue of the political motivation for your actions. It has been suggested that your prime motivation, given your position on the right-wing of the Labour Party, is to attempt to undermine the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn and all that he stands for. I was a committed and experienced member of the Socialist Medical/Health Association (affiliated) since 1946 and have been a member of the Labour Party since 1972, or thereabouts. As such, I find it difficult not to agree with such a conclusion, in the current circumstances. No doubt your fairly regular visits to Israel (as a consequence of your documented links with organisations and individuals there) must be enjoyable for you on a personal level, but would not, surely, be sufficient incentive, in of themselves?
No…. my view is that, to use military terms, you represent a sniper with a long range rifle, ‘softening up’ the enemy, causing confusion in the opposing ranks, picking off individuals and making people afraid of putting their head above the barricades. You are, however, in my view, waiting for your ‘General’ a.k.a. Tony Blair to come and rally the troops for a counter-offensive. I admire your loyalty to him, but would point out that he doesn’t have an awfully good record militarily. That poor record had quite a lot to do with the allies he chose, or was coerced by (in that regard it was interesting to see Mr Blairs’ presence, almost as if he were still a head of state, at the recent funeral of Shimon Peres, in Israel).
So there we have it….I have concern about the nature of your personal behaviour: I am a Corbyn supporter, and have great sympathy with the situation of Ken Livingstone and Jackie Walker, to whom I offer my solidarity: I am also not afraid to look to history for lessons and I view your actions as being ‘McCarthyite’ in nature: I refuse to conflate Anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism and I see through your cloak of justification and heap scorn upon your underlying political motivation……
So, please feel free to denounce me, though, I suspect, that you lack the moral and political courage to do so.
Throughout my 90 years, I have always held to a belief in the essential goodness of people. That belief has been severely tested in recent times, as I have witnessed your machinations and those of the Labour PLP.
Today, the mere demands of day to day living tax me greatly, but with all the energy I can muster, at the age of 90 years, I offer you, Sir, unfortunately, not fraternal wishes, but my heartfelt derision.
Dr Sam Glatt MCRS LRCP MB ChB
British, Socialist Jew.
John Mann MP,
House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA
Cc Jeremy Corbyn MP, Leader of the Labour Party, leader@labour.org.uk
Ken Livingstone, Jackie Walke
Posted by jeffrey davies on 20 October 2016
++++++++++++++++++++++++
westminster ferret
oh dear oh dear eagles being sued ouch
Wallasey CLP to crowdfund defamation lawsuit against Angela Eagle and Labour’s NEC
19
Wednesday
Oct 2016
Posted by Mike Sivier in Uncategorized
≈ Leave a comment
Angela Eagle.
Angela Eagle.
See this, Labour NEC members? This is what you might call ‘biteback’:
It’s in all the mainstream media that Labour’s National Executive Committee (NEC) – or, more correctly, a sub-committee named the Disputes Panel, has upheld Labour MP Angela Eagle’s allegation against her own CLP (Wallasey) that she was subjected to ‘homophobic abuse’. Wallasey CLP’s suspension, already in force for some months, has been extended indefinitely.
The SKWAWKBOX has spoken to a number of members of the CLP who are outraged at both the egregious nature of the slur, which amounts to an allegation of hate crimes, and at the implication that officers – who include members with gay children – failed to deal with, or even encouraged, ‘abuse’.
This writer understands that a number of CLP members are taking legal advice with a view to an action against Labour’s Disputes Panel and against Ms Eagle personally for defamation concerning the latter’s allegations of ‘homophobic abuse’ and will be seeking crowdfunding for the legal action in view of the huge financial support shown by Labour members and others for the court case brought by members disenfranchised during the recent leadership election.
A crowdfunding page is to be set up shortly and details will be posted on this blog and elsewhere. I urge you to support it.
Source: Exclusive: Wallasey CLP to crowdfund defamation lawsuit vs own MP and NEC | The SKWAWKBOX Blog
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Donate Button with Credit Cards
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
Posted by jeffrey davies on 20 October 2016
